Revised UK ‘Guide Eatwell’ wealth promotes health industry is not public, says expert ;
The ‘Guide Eatwell,’ revised UK accounting visually government recommendations on food groups for a “healthy and balanced diet, ‘is not based on evidence, and has been formulated by too many people with ties to industry insists registered dietitian in an editorial published online in British Journal of Sports Medicine .
and the continued focus on high fat low carbs that purveys has been accompanied by continued rises in obesity and diabetes says Dr. Zoe Harcombe the Institute of Clinical Exercise and Health Sciences, University of West of Scotland.
The Eatwell Guide began in 1994 as the balance of good health, a segmented plate daily ratios of food groups necessary for a healthy diet, issued by the Department of Health.
The Food Safety Agency relaunched with “cosmetic changes” as Plate Eatwell in 2007 to its current incarnation in March this year as the Eatwell guide, under the direction of England-New Public Health with many changes purely cosmetic, says Dr. Harcombe.
In its latest guise, the proportions of the segment have changed, with starchy foods increase of 33% to 38% and fruits and vegetables up 33% to 40%, while milk and dairy products almost they have halved from 15% to 8%, for example.
The anterior segment of high fat and sugar foods has been transformed into oils and spreads unsaturated, prompting one of the largest food manufacturers in the UK to carry advertisements in national newspapers celebrating their ” special section, “Dr. Harcombe says.
And she insists:
“The Eatwell Guide was made by an official appointed by the Public Health England group, consisting mainly of members of the food and beverage industry rather than independent experts.”
However, the main shortcoming of the Eatwell Guide “as with its predecessors, is that it is not based on evidence,” she says. “There has been no randomized controlled from one based on the Eatwell Plate Diet Guide or trial, let alone one large enough, long enough, all population generalization” he writes.
The emphasis on carbohydrates is the result of dietary advice to restrict fat, but this was not based on evidence, while advice on carbohydrates has never been tested, she says. “Even the message of hydration [drinking 6-8 glasses of liquid sugar] retains water,” he suggests.
Moreover, in private correspondence with the Food Standards Agency in 2009, the Agency confirmed that the percentages of food groups to the Eatwell plate were based on weight.
But the weight of the food not care for the human body; what counts is the calories, macro- and micronutrients, she says.
“Given the very different caloric content of 100 g of fruits and vegetables vs 100 g of oil, plates ratios change substantially when calories are counted,” he writes.
Arguably fat high carbohydrate diet low has been tested in the UK population, but with a negative impact, as rates of obesity and diabetes have soared since the 70s and 80s , she says.
“The association between the introduction of the dietary guidelines and concomitant increase in obesity and diabetes, deserves examination,” particularly since several recent studies have suggested a causal relationship between the two, she suggests.
“The biggest flaw of the last public health dietary advice could be a missed opportunity to deliver a simple and powerful way to return people to diets that enjoyed before the conditions of carbohydrate called message. but when the who’s who of the food industry have been represented in the group, ‘eat real food!’ was never a likely outcome, “he concludes.
This article was originally published on medicalxpress, Read the original article
Posted in: Health